Regulations covered
SR 11-7 and the parallel guidance your team already references.
SR 11-7
SR 15-18
OCC Bulletin 2011-12
FFIEC model risk
SR 11-7 is the Federal Reserve's supervisory letter on model risk management. SR 15-18 supplements it for complex and judgmental models, including modern ML and AI. OCC Bulletin 2011-12 carries the same requirements for OCC-supervised institutions. FFIEC joint guidance builds on all three for the broader US banking population. KoraSafe™ maps to the requirements common to all four documents, cited by section.
What KoraSafe™ delivers
One platform across the four requirements.
Inventory and tiering (SR 11-7 §II)
Every AI system is registered with owner, autonomy tier, decomposed risk score, lifecycle state, and regulatory tier before it reaches production. Five-tier autonomy maps to SR 11-7 materiality tiering. The registry is the inventory SR 11-7 §II requires, in the format your model risk team can hand to an examiner without reformatting.
Validation evidence (SR 11-7 §IV)
Hallucination detection covers conceptual soundness for generative models (groundedness against authoritative sources). Fairness Watchdog covers outcomes analysis (disparate-impact monitoring across protected attributes). Behavioral Drift Detector covers ongoing distribution-shift validation. Anomaly Killer covers effective challenge with statistical outlier detection. Each guardian writes findings mapped to SR 11-7 §IV by section, not flagged generically.
Governance and board reporting (SR 11-7 §V)
Policy authoring, approval workflows, lifecycle transitions, and dry-runs against staging produce the paper trail §V requires. Governance index publishes a board-readable score quarterly with drilldown to the underlying findings, model versions, and policy events. Senior management gets the quarterly model risk view regulators expect.
Ongoing monitoring (SR 11-7 §III)
Drift Detector and Anomaly Killer run continuously against per-system baselines. Findings link back to the model, the time window, and the SR 11-7 monitoring section, so your next exam starts from a documented record. Risk score history tracks performance degradation per system over time.
Audit chain for examiner handoff
Every finding traces back to the regulation section, the model version, the policy that fired, and the reviewer who closed it. SR 11-7 audit-package endpoint generates SR 11-7-keyed evidence bundles with vendor attestations, model risk approvals, and fairness findings, pre-organized for examiner review.
Companion FFIEC + NAIC coverage
SR 11-7 doesn't run alone in a model risk program. The financial services pack carries FFIEC joint-agency guidance, NAIC Model Bulletin for insurance carriers, ECOA / Reg B for fair-lending evidence, NYDFS Part 500 for state cybersecurity sign-off. Same audit chain, same evidence format, same examiner-ready output.
Honest state
Gaps we are not yet covering, naming them explicitly
Most SR 11-7 components are live. Two are not. Surfacing them here rather than in the AC of a sales call.
Formal validation report artifact
Guardians produce findings mapped to SR 11-7 §IV. KoraSafe™ does not yet emit a bundled "SR 11-7 validation report" document per model, in the format examiners expect for a model validation deliverable. Today, your model risk team assembles the validation report from the guardian findings, the risk score history, and the audit-chain evidence package. A native validation-report artifact is on the roadmap.
Model change management lifecycle
Policy lifecycle transitions exist with re-approval triggers. The equivalent state machine for model-level changes (retrain, version bump, use-case extension, decommission) is not yet wired with automatic re-validation triggers. Today, model changes flow through your existing change-management process; KoraSafe™ captures the event but doesn't enforce re-validation gates. Roadmap.
Inventory, validation evidence, governance, monitoring, audit chain
Financial services sector pack with SR 11-7 mapping
Validation report artifact + model change lifecycle
How this compares
Why no other platform names SR 11-7 end to end.
Adjacent vendors handle pieces of SR 11-7, none of them name the four requirements together. Honest read of current public materials:
Credo AISR 11-7 mentioned as a frameworkpolicy/risk-assessment focus, no runtime telemetry
FiddlerMonitoring strongML engineer audience, no evidence packages or board pack
Holistic AIRisk assessment + governancethin on runtime monitoring evidence and audit-chain artifacts
ArizeML observabilityengineer audience, no governance layer
WitnessAIRuntime intent enforcementno model risk or financial services positioning
Corrections welcome at Contact-us@korasafe.ai. Public competitive positioning shifts faster than this page; we date-stamp the comparison so readers know what window we surveyed.
Talk to model risk
Your next exam window is closer than your validation backlog suggests.
If your model risk team has an SR 11-7 review on the calendar, KoraSafe™ is built for that exam window. Start your free trial for onboarding, or jump to the financial services pack to see how SR 11-7 sits inside the broader FinServ coverage.