Detect

Caught in real time, not next quarter.

Detect sensitive data exposure, prompt injection, unsafe outputs, drift, access anomalies, and policy violations across live agents, pre-launch checks, and outside-in black-box tests.

Every finding updates risk posture and routes into the governance workflow. For agents you cannot instrument, KoraSafe™ tests from the outside and still produces a score, findings, and evidence pack.

Guardian Agents

A roster of 18 always-on guardian modules monitors AI agent inputs, outputs, behavior, and agent-to-agent traffic for the common classes of AI risk, each one configurable per agent.

AI agents expose organizations on multiple proven harm vectors at once. Per-class detection in one platform, with every finding normalized to one schema, beats stitching point tools together. Policy, risk, and audit work identically regardless of source.

korasafe.ai/detect/guardians
Guardian module roster monitoring live traffic Guardian module roster monitoring live traffic
18 always-on guardian modules
Guardian module roster monitoring live traffic

Black-box Testing

Many real AI agents are ones you didn’t build: a Copilot, a vendor chatbot, or an agent a team switched on without asking. You can’t put guardians inside them, so KoraSafe tests them from the outside instead.

Realistic risky questions, judged against the same rules, turned into a score and an evidence pack.

Control what you run. Test what you don’t. Prove all of it.
No integration needed
If you can reach the agent over the web, you can test it, whether or not it was built with KoraSafe.
The same six risk areas
Personal data, made-up answers, jailbreaks, unsafe advice, acting without asking, and fairness.
A score and an evidence pack
One number per agent, plus the paperwork an auditor reads.
Judged against the same rules
Outside-in tests use the identical rule packs and schema as instrumented agents. One standard covers what you build and what you buy.
Realistic adversarial suites
Curated risky prompts probe jailbreaks, data leakage, and unsafe advice the way a real attacker or careless user would.
korasafe.ai/detect/black-box
0 integration required
Outside-in test run with scored results

Risk Scoring

A continuously updated risk score for every registered AI agent with predictive forecasting, presented as a leaderboard, with a FAIR-adapted quantitative model underneath.

Boards need a compact, legible per-system risk signal and a prioritization queue, not hundreds of findings to triage by hand. A tracked score is also evidence that an ongoing risk management system actually operates.

Boards speak in dollars, not red-amber-green. KoraSafe scores risk as loss estimates: backtested, calibrated, defensible.
Recomputed daily, from real signals
Open findings, finding age, autonomy tier, framework coverage gap, and enforcement patterns.
FAIR quantitative model
Monte Carlo simulation at 1k, 10k, or 100k trials with per-model calibration produces loss estimates, not just labels.
Board-ready exports
Per-system trends and a board export that turns the leaderboard into a meeting-ready document.
Industry benchmarks
Differentially private cohort averages put each score in sector context.
korasafe.ai/detect/risk-scoring
Agent risk leaderboard with loss estimates Agent risk leaderboard with loss estimates
100k Monte Carlo trials per run
Agent risk leaderboard with loss estimates

Pre-Launch Risk Checks

A pre-launch check that evaluates a new AI agent’s registration attributes against a research-authored rule pack of known failure patterns, before anything ships.

A gap caught before launch costs far less than one found in production. The engine is deterministic, with no ML inference, so results are reproducible, and every finding carries the rule, the matched condition, and the regulatory citation.

Citation-carrying findings
Each rule traces to a regulatory article, so findings arrive with their justification attached.
Where engineers already work
Registration flow, inline VS Code and JetBrains warnings, a Chrome extension, and a pre-commit GitHub Action all report into the same review queue.
Backtested accuracy
A backtesting service measures predictions against realized outcomes: accuracy, Brier score, calibration curves, and drift alerts.
Policy gates at the boundary
Approval gates, autonomy ceilings, and human review keep agent behavior inside approved boundaries before promotion.
Reusable rule packs
Research-authored failure-pattern packs are versioned and shared across teams instead of re-derived per project.
korasafe.ai/detect/pre-launch
Pre-launch gate with citation-carrying findings Pre-launch gate with citation-carrying findings
0 ML deterministic, reproducible
Pre-launch gate with citation-carrying findings

Detection Connectors

A connector framework that normalizes findings from third-party detection engines into the KoraSafe governance schema, so policy, risk, and audit work the same regardless of which engine fired.

Enterprise security stacks are fragmented, with existing investments in detection tooling. Connectors meet teams where they are instead of forcing replacement, and mapping raw engine output to specific regulatory articles is regulatory expertise, not just engineering.

10 approved guardrail connectors
Datadog AI Observability, AWS Bedrock Guardrails, Presidio, Portkey, LangSmith, Lakera Guard, Azure Content Safety, OpenAI Moderation, Vertex AI Safety, and Anthropic Safety.
Regulatory mapping built in
Vendor output translates to framework, control, and severity, not just a generic alert.
Reliable connector operations
Circuit breakers, retries, OAuth, and credential vaulting around every adapter, with health from real telemetry.
Engine-agnostic by contract
The underlying engine can swap behind a stable guardian contract. Support a new engine with an adapter, not a platform release.
korasafe.ai/detect/connectors
Connector health across detection engines Connector health across detection engines
10 approved guardrail connectors
Connector health across detection engines
Detect

Catch risky behavior before users see it.

Run runtime detectors, score findings, and route remediation before AI risk becomes an audit issue.