AI agent governance readiness

How evidence-ready are your AI agents?

Get a clear read on inventory, ownership, controls, risk monitoring, and audit evidence. Then scope one AI system against the regulatory obligations that matter.

10 questions ~3 minutes instant score

Discover

Know your agents, surface shadow AI, and maintain a current inventory.

Govern

Map regulations and obligations to the agents they actually affect.

Detect

Watch runtime behavior for PII leakage, injection, hallucination, and drift.

Score

Prioritize AI risk by severity, autonomy, governance gaps, and trend.

Prove

Prepare evidence for audits, decisions, approvals, and regulatory duties.

Step 2, agent assessment

Answer a few focused questions. Your risk level updates as you go, and a personalized report is ready at the end.

The agent and your role

Tell us what it is and where you sit under the Act.

Banned-use check

Tick anything it does. A flagged practice may fall within an EU AI Act prohibition and requires legal review.

Autonomy and safety

How freely it acts, and how people stay in control.

Proof and evidence

Optional now. Add what you know, or skip and finish the assessment.

Assess one agent against regulatory frameworks.

Answer a few focused questions. Your risk level updates as you go, and a personalized report is ready at the end.

{{ agentProgressLabel }}

Why frameworks matter

As teams ship more agents that act on their own, governance frameworks are how you prove an agent is safe and allowed to run. Your answers carry across the frameworks most teams already track.

EU AI Act

EU, law

Risk-based duties for AI, the first to put hard rules on agents that act on their own.

NIST AI RMF

US, voluntary

Its govern, map, measure, manage functions mirror the same oversight duties.

ISO 42001

Global, certifiable

An AI management-system standard you can certify against.

GDPR

EU, data

The data and transparency rules the Act builds on.

The agent and your role

Tell us what it is and where you sit under the Act.

Agent name

Version

Your role

What it does and its limits

What is it used for?

▾

Industry

Banned-use check

Tick anything it does. A flagged practice may fall within an EU AI Act prohibition and requires legal review.

We always run this check. These practices can trigger EU AI Act prohibited-practice review and are treated as high-scrutiny signals across most AI governance programs.

You flagged a possible prohibited practice.

A flagged practice may fall within an EU AI Act prohibition. Treat this as a legal-review trigger before any EU use, so the high-risk evidence section below pauses until counsel confirms the path forward. Finish the assessment to get a report on what to review, or uncheck it above if it doesn't apply to you.

Autonomy and safety

How freely it acts, and how people stay in control.

How independently does it act?

Where do people step in?

Oversight built into this one agent (Art. 14), not a company-wide policy. "Spot-check and audit" means a person regularly reviews a sample of this agent's decisions.

Proof and evidence

Optional now. Add what you know, or skip and finish the assessment.

Most of these you assemble for this agent. The exception is your quality-management system (Art. 17), you build it once for the whole organization and reuse it for every agent.

{{ t.art }}

Data quality

Bad data in, liability out. Show your data is clean and fair.

{{ t.art }}

Transparency and monitoring

Keep users in the loop and watch the agent after launch.

Telling users and CE marking are per-agent. Drift monitoring and incident reporting are processes you run once across the agent portfolio, then apply to this agent.

{{ t.art }}

Risk level

ready

{{ readyCountLabel }}

Articles 8 to 15 ready

{{ artNote }}

The eight duties the Act sets for high-risk agents. A dot fills in as your answers below cover that duty.

{{ a.art }}

Safety controls

Extra guardrails the Act expects once an agent can act on its own.

Report available at the end.

Finish the agent assessment to generate a KoraSafe-branded PDF with your score, risk tier, gaps, and first fixes.

Book a demo instead {{ arrowRightSm }}

Get your AI governance report.

Enter your details. We'll generate a personalized PDF with your score, regulatory assessment, and what to prioritize next, and send it to your inbox.

This self-assessment is for governance planning only. It is not legal advice, and EU AI Act classifications, prohibited-practice questions, and launch decisions should be reviewed with qualified counsel.

Business email

Your name

Company

Your role (optional)

By submitting, you agree to KoraSafe contacting you about your results. No spam.

How evidence-ready are your AI agents?

Discover

Govern

Detect

Score

Prove

Step 2, agent assessment

The agent and your role

Banned-use check

Autonomy and safety

Proof and evidence

How evidence-ready are your AI agents?

{{ questionText }}

Assess one agent against regulatory frameworks.

Report on its way.

Get your AI governance report.