AI agent governance readiness

How audit-ready are your AI agents?

Find out before an auditor, or your board, does. Get a clear read on where your AI agents stand in two minutes, then zoom in on the risk inside any single agent.

10 questions
~3 minutes
instant score
What we'll measure
{{ d.icon }}
{{ d.name }}
{{ d.tag }}
{{ d.num }}
{{ curDimIcon }}
{{ curDimName }}
{{ qNumLabel }}

{{ questionText }}

{{ o.tick }}
{{ o.label }}
Your result
{{ scorePctLabel }}
ready
{{ bandName }}
{{ bandDesc }}
Benchmarked against
EU AI Act
The EU's risk-based law for AI, and the first to put hard duties on autonomous systems. For agentic AI companies it's the one that bites: agents that act on their own land in the high-risk tier fastest, where human oversight, logging and accountability become legal requirements, not nice-to-haves. Getting ahead of it is now a condition of selling into Europe.
Step 2, assess one agent to unlock your full report.
Your score is on its way. Check your inbox.
Prefer your score in your inbox?
{{ surveyError }}
Not ready to assess an agent? Book a demo {{ arrowRightSm }}
Pillar by pillar
{{ d.icon }}
{{ d.name }}
{{ d.tag }}
{{ d.pctLabel }}
Close this gap first
{{ gapName }}
{{ gapRec }}
{{ gapCta }} {{ arrowRightSm }}
Your strength
{{ strengthName }}
{{ strengthRec }}
Step 2, agent assessment

Assess one agent against the EU AI Act.

Answer a few focused questions. Your risk level updates as you go, and a personalized report is ready at the end.

{{ agentProgressLabel }}
Why frameworks matter

As teams ship more agents that act on their own, governance frameworks are how you prove an agent is safe and allowed to run. This assessment uses the EU AI Act as the lens, the one rule with real legal teeth, and your answers carry across the frameworks most teams already track.

EU AI Act
EU, law
Risk-based duties for AI, the first to put hard rules on agents that act on their own.
NIST AI RMF
US, voluntary
Its govern, map, measure, manage functions mirror the same oversight duties.
ISO 42001
Global, certifiable
An AI management-system standard you can certify against.
GDPR
EU, data
The data and transparency rules the Act builds on.
01
The agent and your role
Tell us what it is and where you sit under the Act.
{{ acc1Status }}
Agent name
Version
Your role
{{ a.tick }}
{{ a.name }}
{{ a.desc }}
What it does and its limits
What is it used for?
▾
Industry
{{ euSwitch.t }}
{{ euSwitch.desc }}
{{ acc1Error }}
02
Banned-use check
Tick anything it does. Any tick means it can't be used in the EU.
{{ acc2Status }}
{{ x.tick }}
{{ x.t }}
{{ x.desc }}
We always run this check. These practices are banned outright in the EU and treated as off-limits across most AI rules, no matter where your agent runs.
You flagged a banned practice.
An agent that does this can't be used in the EU and has to change before launch, so the high-risk evidence section below greys out as no longer the point. Finish the assessment to get a report on what to fix, or uncheck it above if it doesn't apply to you.
03
Autonomy and safety
How freely it acts, and how people stay in control.
{{ acc3Status }}
How independently does it act?
{{ t.n }}
{{ t.name }}
{{ autoDesc }}
Where do people step in?
Oversight built into this one agent (Art. 14), not a company-wide policy. "Spot-check and audit" means a person regularly reviews a sample of this agent's decisions.
{{ h.tick }}
{{ h.t }}
{{ killSwitch.t }}
{{ killSwitch.desc }}
{{ explainSwitch.t }}
{{ explainSwitch.desc }}
04
Proof and evidence
Optional now. Add what you know, or skip and finish the assessment.
{{ appliesLabel }}
{{ acc4Status }}
Most of these you assemble for this agent. The exception is your quality-management system (Art. 17), you build it once for the whole organization and reuse it for every agent.
{{ t.tick }}
{{ t.label }}
{{ t.desc }}
{{ t.art }}
05
Data quality
Bad data in, liability out. Show your data is clean and fair.
{{ acc5Status }}
{{ t.tick }}
{{ t.label }}
{{ t.desc }}
{{ t.art }}
06
Transparency and monitoring
Keep users in the loop and watch the agent after launch.
{{ acc6Status }}
Telling users and CE marking are per-agent. Drift monitoring and incident reporting are processes you run once across the whole fleet, then apply to this agent.
{{ t.tick }}
{{ t.label }}
{{ t.desc }}
{{ t.art }}
Risk level
{{ riskLabel }}
{{ riskHeadline }}
{{ riskNote }}
{{ agentPctLabel }}
ready
{{ riskHeadline }}
{{ riskNote }}
{{ readyCountLabel }}
Articles 8 to 15 ready
{{ artNote }}
The eight duties the Act sets for high-risk agents. A dot fills in as your answers below cover that duty.
{{ a.tick }}
{{ a.art }}
{{ a.t }}
Safety controls
Extra guardrails the Act expects once an agent can act on its own.
{{ f.tick }}
{{ f.t }}
Report available at the end.
Finish the agent assessment to generate a KoraSafe-branded PDF with your score, risk tier, gaps, and first fixes.
Book a demo instead {{ arrowRightSm }}

Report on its way.

Your PDF is downloading now. A copy has been sent to {{ captureEmail }}.

Someone from KoraSafe™ will follow up to walk through the results with you.

Book a demo {{ arrowRight }}
Your report

Get your AI governance report.

Enter your details. We'll generate a personalized PDF with your score, EU AI Act assessment, and what to prioritize next, and send it to your inbox.

Business email
Your name
Company
Your role (optional)
{{ submitError }}

By submitting, you agree to KoraSafe™ contacting you about your results. No spam.